Working Paper 005: Reconciling the GTAP Data Base: Where are the Big Changes?
By Terrie Walmsley, Badri Narayanan, Angel Aguiar and Robert McDougall
Publishing Year: 2015
Inaccuracies in the collection and compiling of data mean that data supplied by one country is rarely consistent with data supplied by another. Even within the same country, the same data collected from two alternative sources could vary due to differences in how the data is being collected, interpreted, classified, and valued, notwithstanding the differences caused by simple errors and omissions. Global economic analysis however, requires consistent and reconciled global data, and this reconciliation process is laden with judgments about the quality of the alternative data sets being reconciled. In the case of the GTAP Data Base (Narayanan, Aguiar et al. 2012) the externally collected trade, macro, protection and energy data supplied by international sources are considered superior to individual country data because it has typically gone through a standardization and balancing process. In this paper, we hope to shed some light on the extent to which the country data changes as a result of the GTAP construction process. In particular, we are interested in identifying where the largest changes occur as a result of this reconciliation process. The answers to these questions can be used to help ascertain where resources might best be utilized to further improve the quality of global data.
An improved version of this paper, titled: “Building a global database: consequences for the national I–O data” has now been published by Economic Systems Research.
Download Working Paper
The owners of ImpactECON reserve the right to publish discussion items or comments and to otherwise moderate the content. Email addresses will be used solely to verify the identity of the comment author and will not be used for marketing or sold.